Bike advocates: do not tell people to just "take the lane."

Telling people the safest place to ride their bike is smack in front of impatient drivers behind them is not the way to get more people on bikes.

Building infrastructure that protects them from those drivers is.

🧵

Well-meaning bicyclists will often respond to my close pass videos by telling me I should not be afraid to take the lane.

I'm not afraid to take the lane. I'm actually a pretty brave, intrepid person, and I've voluntarily and knowingly done some very dangerous stuff in my life. Rode horses professionally. Learned how to use a trapeze. Hiked the AT. Jumped out of planes...until it got boring.

I'm not risk averse. If my video appears to show me not taking a lane on my bike, rest assured it's not because I'm chicken.

But here's the thing. NO one should have to take the lane. It's scary as $^#$ to put your body in front of a fast-moving multi-ton metal box that's driven by someone with woefully inadequate training.

And if doing that IS in fact the safest way to ride on some roads, then the problem is not with the rider. It's with the road.

Follow

The vast majority of roads in the US present deadly hazards for anyone not in a car. I have no interest myself, nor do I have any desire for anyone else--especially not a kid or a biking newbie--to get any farther into them than absolutely necessary.

No one should have to be an adrenaline junkie with world-class bike handling skills and [body part of choice] of steel to in order to feel safe traveling around their community under their own power.

So the next time you find yourself about to advise someone to 'take the lane,' save your breath, because you're going to need it when you join us in the fight for safe bike infrastructure on every road, for everyone.

@DrTCombs I think the research behind that advice needs updating anyway. Since I last saw a study showing taking the lane improved outcomes, roads have gotten wider, “cars” have gotten bigger, speeds have gotten higher, drivers have gotten more distracted by infotainment in their vehicles, fewer drivers have experience cycling for transportation, and the continued presence of bicyclists on roads has gotten more politicized.

@PedestrianError This is a really important point! Regardless of whether vehicular cycling and 'taking the lane' was ever a good idea, it's demonstrably unsafe in nearly every situation today.

@DrTCombs This happens to me nearly EVERY time when I’m riding on the roads of Athens Ohio.

@DrTCombs 15 year old kid came to our cycling advocacy group the other night — “avid” rider, got hit by a driver in an e-car and had to be airlifted to the hospital — came to talk about a campaign he’s starting to provide bike lights to teenagers. One of our members, and therefore ostensibly among the most educated in our broader community regarding safe cycling, chose to grill him about what color his clothes were… pardon my French, but: fuck that.

@DrTCombs Occasionally I take the lane. I don't like doing it because it's a choice between letting a bad driver squeeze me or blocking him.
I never recommend it and I certainly don't think it is advocacy.

@swfong I take the lane frequently as well. And the roads that make me feel like I need to do that are not the same roads I let my child ride on.

I want roads that work for her.

@DrTCombs PS I'm glad we aren't on the birdsite, where there are many advocates for V------- Cycling. They would go bananas here.

I will mention that I asked a VC advocate if anyone does V------- Cycling in NYC. Try blocking angry NY drivers and see how they respond...

@swfong I posted a similar thread there but got my account protected and carefully curated ;)

@swfong @DrTCombs I’m kind of in the middle.

I have some big problems with segregated infrastructure, at least from what I’ve experienced — construction debris, lack of passing room, right-hand turns, other unpassable obstructions.

I am ALL for building extensive bicycle-specific infrastructure for all ages and abiilities, but I would also love to reserve the legal right to take a bicycle anywhere a car goes, because it seems like we’ll always have to sometime.

@peterbutler @DrTCombs It is the discussion about taking the lane as it fits into bike advocacy.

I posted a vid where I took the lane and while it wasn't pleasant to be honked, that SUV would have passed me with a foot of room.

The real answer is to ticket double parkers. Some might tell me not to be afraid of cars.

@swfong @DrTCombs Thanks for the extra explanation.

Yeah, I think “taking the lane” has little to do with bike advocacy, but I’d like to preserve that protection in the state code (CA). I don’t know if that's at risk at all, but I worry about it sometimes.

Definitely be afraid of cars. I’ve been hit. You don’t want to be.

@peterbutler @DrTCombs I don't want to mention the movement in fears that I might summon them, but there are advocates who think bikers should ride like cars and scoff at bike lanes.

@swfong @DrTCombs There are all sorts. :D

Fear of cars is the biggest thing to overcome for getting more people to bike, and keeping bikes and cars separate is key.

The biggest pain points for me are where the segregated infrastructure ends.

@DrTCombs That reminds me that I recorded exactly what I described: I took the lane, which is perfectly legal, on a street with 8 double parked cars to prevent a big SUV from squeezing me.

The driver honks me for blocking him.

youtu.be/O3bsm9xdrpI

@DrTCombs Also I should point out that I didn't "block" the driver. I was going 10mph as I was approaching a stop sign. But a biker in the middle of the road? Let's scare the shit out of him

Sign in to participate in the conversation
transportation.social

A Mastodon instance for transportation professionals!